ATAS takes the higher overall PlatformScore (77/100 vs 72/100), leading on value, order flow, ease of use, broker/data and community. MotiveWave counters with stronger automation. Both are built for futures traders, but they land in different spots. This page breaks down all seven scoring axes, then a plain answer on who should pick which.
| Feature | ATAS | MotiveWave |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing structure (lifetime vs monthly) | Free tier · Lifetime $1079-2159 | Free tier, paid from $24-159/mo · Lifetime $245-2295 |
| Supported data feeds | Rithmic, CQG, dxFeed | Rithmic, CQG |
| Prop firm support | Moderate-High (Rithmic (broad)) | Moderate-High (Rithmic (broad)) |
| Metric | ATAS | MotiveWave |
|---|---|---|
| From | $0-89.95/mo | $24-159/mo |
| Prop-firm support | Moderate-High | Moderate-High |
| Connection | Rithmic (broad) | Rithmic (broad) |
| Value | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Order Flow | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| Automation | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| Ease of Use | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Broker/Data | 8.5 | 6.5 |
| Prop-Firm | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Community | 9.1 | 8.2 |
| PlatformScore | 77 | 72 |
Visit ATAS →Visit MotiveWave →
Price & value: ATAS leads here at 9.0/10 (elite) vs MotiveWave's 8.0/10. ATAS runs $0-89.95/mo with a free tier, MotiveWave runs $24-159/mo with a free tier. Value here weighs subscription cost against the data feed you can't avoid, not just the sticker price.
Order flow: ATAS leads here at 9.0/10 (elite) vs MotiveWave's 8.0/10. This axis measures footprint charts, DOM/ladder tools, volume profile and liquidity heatmaps, the tools order-flow and tape-reading traders lean on most.
Automation & backtesting: MotiveWave leads here at 8.0/10 (excellent) vs ATAS's 5.0/10. This axis measures scripting language depth and the strategy backtesting/optimization engine, what matters if you're coding and testing your own systems rather than trading discretionarily.
Ease of use: ATAS leads here at 6.0/10 (middling) vs MotiveWave's 4.0/10. This axis measures how quickly a new trader gets productive, the inverse of the learning curve. It matters most in the first few weeks, well before it affects your actual trading results.
Broker & data flexibility: ATAS leads here at 8.5/10 (excellent) vs MotiveWave's 6.5/10. ATAS connects via Rithmic (broad) across 3 data feed(s). MotiveWave connects via Rithmic (broad) across 2 data feed(s). Broker lock-in matters if you ever want to switch brokers without switching platforms too.
Prop-firm support: ATAS and MotiveWave are essentially tied here (7.0 vs 7.0/10). ATAS rates Moderate-High for prop-firm support (Rithmic (broad)). MotiveWave rates Moderate-High (Rithmic (broad)). Both are confirmed compatible with Apex, Bulenox, Elite Trader Funding.
ATAS wins 4 of these 6 head-to-head axes to 1, but the margins vary a lot, worth weighing which axes matter most for how you actually trade.
Pick ATAS if its community rating and value for money matter most to you. It's the stronger fit for community-driven traders and budget-conscious traders. One concrete edge: genuinely usable free tier.
Pick MotiveWave if its community rating and value for money matter most to you instead. It leans toward community-driven traders and budget-conscious traders. One concrete edge: genuinely usable free tier.
Neither choice is permanent. Most traders eventually run more than one platform side by side once they know exactly which job each one is best at.
ATAS is cheaper to start than MotiveWave. See the price & value breakdown above for what that actually buys you on each platform.
They're evenly matched here, both rate Moderate-High via Rithmic (broad). Always confirm your specific firm allows the platform before funding an account.
ATAS scores higher for order-flow and DOM depth, 9.0/10 vs 8.0/10. That's the axis footprint, DOM/ladder and volume-profile traders should weigh most heavily.
MotiveWave scores higher for automation and backtesting, 5.0/10 vs 8.0/10, the axis that covers scripting depth and strategy testing.
ATAS has the gentler learning curve, rating 6.0/10 for ease of use vs 4.0/10. A shorter learning curve mostly saves you time in the first few weeks, it isn't a lasting edge on its own.
ATAS scores 77/100 overall, MotiveWave scores 72/100. ATAS is the higher overall score, driven mainly by the axes where it leads above.
Yes. Plenty of traders run two platforms side by side, one for charting and order flow and another for automation or execution, rather than treating this as an exclusive choice.