ATAS takes the higher overall PlatformScore (77/100 vs 76/100), leading on order flow and community. NinjaTrader counters with stronger automation and prop-firm. Both are built for futures traders, but they land in different spots. This page breaks down all seven scoring axes, then a plain answer on who should pick which.
| Feature | ATAS | NinjaTrader |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing structure (lifetime vs monthly) | Free tier · Lifetime $1079-2159 | Free tier · Lifetime $1499 |
| Supported data feeds | Rithmic, CQG, dxFeed | NinjaTrader/Rithmic, CQG, Kinetick |
| Prop firm support | Moderate-High (Rithmic (broad)) | High (Rithmic (broad)) |
| Metric | ATAS | NinjaTrader |
|---|---|---|
| From | $0-89.95/mo | $0-99/mo |
| Prop-firm support | Moderate-High | High |
| Connection | Rithmic (broad) | Rithmic (broad) |
| Value | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Order Flow | 9.0 | 6.0 |
| Automation | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| Ease of Use | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Broker/Data | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Prop-Firm | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| Community | 9.1 | 8.0 |
| PlatformScore | 77 | 76 |
Visit ATAS →Visit NinjaTrader →
Price & value: ATAS and NinjaTrader are essentially tied here (9.0 vs 9.0/10). ATAS runs $0-89.95/mo with a free tier, NinjaTrader runs $0-99/mo with a free tier. Value here weighs subscription cost against the data feed you can't avoid, not just the sticker price.
Order flow: ATAS leads here at 9.0/10 (elite) vs NinjaTrader's 6.0/10. This axis measures footprint charts, DOM/ladder tools, volume profile and liquidity heatmaps, the tools order-flow and tape-reading traders lean on most.
Automation & backtesting: NinjaTrader leads here at 8.0/10 (excellent) vs ATAS's 5.0/10. This axis measures scripting language depth and the strategy backtesting/optimization engine, what matters if you're coding and testing your own systems rather than trading discretionarily.
Ease of use: ATAS and NinjaTrader are essentially tied here (6.0 vs 6.0/10). This axis measures how quickly a new trader gets productive, the inverse of the learning curve. It matters most in the first few weeks, well before it affects your actual trading results.
Broker & data flexibility: ATAS and NinjaTrader are essentially tied here (8.5 vs 8.5/10). ATAS connects via Rithmic (broad) across 3 data feed(s). NinjaTrader connects via Rithmic (broad) across 3 data feed(s). Broker lock-in matters if you ever want to switch brokers without switching platforms too.
Prop-firm support: NinjaTrader leads here at 8.5/10 (excellent) vs ATAS's 7.0/10. ATAS rates Moderate-High for prop-firm support (Rithmic (broad)). NinjaTrader rates High (Rithmic (broad)). Both are confirmed compatible with Apex, Bulenox, Earn2Trade.
NinjaTrader wins 2 of these 6 head-to-head axes to 1, but the margins vary a lot, worth weighing which axes matter most for how you actually trade.
Pick ATAS if its community rating and value for money matter most to you. It's the stronger fit for community-driven traders and budget-conscious traders. One concrete edge: genuinely usable free tier.
Pick NinjaTrader if value for money and data-feed & broker flexibility matter most to you instead. It leans toward budget-conscious traders and multi-broker traders. One concrete edge: genuinely usable free tier.
Neither choice is permanent. Most traders eventually run more than one platform side by side once they know exactly which job each one is best at.
ATAS and NinjaTrader cost about the same to get started, $0-89.95/mo vs $0-99/mo. See the price & value breakdown above for what that actually buys you on each platform.
NinjaTrader rates higher for prop-firm support here. ATAS is Moderate-High (Rithmic (broad)), NinjaTrader is High (Rithmic (broad)). Always confirm your specific firm allows the platform before funding an account.
ATAS scores higher for order-flow and DOM depth, 9.0/10 vs 6.0/10. That's the axis footprint, DOM/ladder and volume-profile traders should weigh most heavily.
NinjaTrader scores higher for automation and backtesting, 5.0/10 vs 8.0/10, the axis that covers scripting depth and strategy testing.
They're evenly matched for ease of use, both rate 6.0/10 for how fast a new trader gets productive.
ATAS scores 77/100 overall, NinjaTrader scores 76/100. Both are close, so the axis breakdown above matters more than the total.
Yes. Plenty of traders run two platforms side by side, one for charting and order flow and another for automation or execution, rather than treating this as an exclusive choice.